Tests that measure 'biological age' aren't helpful for tracking your health, scientists say

1. Health
2. Aging

Tests that measure 'biological age' aren't helpful for tracking your health, scientists say

Tests that measure biological aging are informative tools for studying large numbers of people but not for tracking individual health status.

By Abner Apsley, Idan Shalev published 29 May 2026 in Opinion

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Are biological age tests worth the price tag? (Image credit: BSIP via Getty Images)

• Copy link
• Facebook
• X
• Reddit
• Pinterest
• Flipboard

Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter

Imagine receiving a test result that tells you your body is biologically five years older than your chronological age. You exercise regularly, get good sleep, eat healthy meals and have a happy personal life. What have you been doing wrong? Can this test be trusted?

Dozens of companies are marketing products that promise to reveal a person’s "true" biological age — that is, how well your body is functioning — for a price ranging from around US$30 to over $1,000. These products are based on epigenetic aging clocks, which are research tools that estimate age based on a person's DNA. These clocks are reshaping how scientists study aging and how the public thinks about it.

But while epigenetic clocks are highly effective research tools to study aging at the population level, they aren't designed to make claims about the health of individuals.

You may like

• 'We can identify these really early, before the clinical diagnosis': Epigenetic markers may help explain why Native Hawaiians are aging faster
• Brain aging results from a loss of control over how genes are regulated, mouse study suggests
• Could gut microbes hold the secret to aging well? A researcher unpacks the emerging science

We are biobehavioral health scientists who study how early development and environmental factors across the lifespan shape biological aging, influencing health and disease decades later. As researchers who use epigenetic clocks in our work, we have found them to be highly informative tools when studying large numbers of people. But these clocks can provide faulty results at the individual level, and they do not meet the standards required of common medical tests.

What are epigenetic clocks?

Measuring reversible chemical changes to DNA, known as epigenetic marks, can provide information about how your body is aging.

Using DNA obtained from routine blood draws, researchers can measure millions of these epigenetic marks in an individual. Running statistical algorithms on this information can produce a single value that represents that person's epigenetic age, analogous to chronological age.

Epigenetic clocks work because the chemical marks on DNA can shift over time and are influenced by lifestyle, stress and the environment. These changes capture aspects of aging that chronological age alone may not reflect.

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

In this way, epigenetic clocks help scientists identify the experiences, exposures and behaviors that may accelerate or slow biological aging.

Epigenetics: Can we change our genes? - BBC World Service - YouTube Watch On

Not for individual health decisions

Why can't epigenetic clocks provide reliable results about biological age for individual people?

First, there are dozens of different types of epigenetic clocks, each designed for a specific purpose. Some are used to predict a person's age, while others are used to predict how fast someone is aging or how many years until they die. These different clocks do not always agree with one another, even when used on the same person.

What to read next

• Loneliness may contribute to memory issues, but not dementia — they are 'not the same thing'
• AI-written code can beat humans at biomedical analysis, some studies find. What does that mean for the field?
• New blood test aims to spot liver scarring before it paves the way to cancer

Second, epigenetic changes are dynamic, making age predictions sensitive to short-term fluctuations in diet, environmental exposures, illness, time of day and other transient factors. As a result, estimated age could vary substantially depending on when someone is tested.

Third, constructing epigenetic clocks is technically challenging, and there is no established gold-standard method for generating clocks across laboratories. For example, testing epigenetic age in saliva versus blood samples can yield substantially different results for the same person. The technologies used to measure epigenetic marks have also evolved over time and will likely continue to improve. As these methods change, the original algorithms designed for specific measurement platforms may not perform the same way.

Experts don't always agree on what aging means.

(Image credit: Elena Pejchinova via Getty Images)

Fourth, scientists do not universally agree on what aging means, in part because it is a very complex process. Reducing that complexity to a single number, such as an epigenetic age, can be misleading.

Finally, epigenetic clocks are influenced by a person's history of trauma, discrimination and early life adversity. This makes their use at the individual level potentially problematic. On average, marginalized communities tend to show signs of accelerated aging when assessed with epigenetic clocks. If insurance companies began using epigenetic age estimates to set premiums, many people could face higher costs for biological differences shaped by circumstances beyond their control, potentially deepening existing health disparities.

Studying how aging unfolds over time

While epigenetic clocks are not appropriate tools for individual health decisions, this does not mean they lack value.

Researchers have used epigenetic clocks to discover lifestyle habits that can, on average, slow down aging. Some examples include reducing daily calorie intake, exercising regularly, maintaining a healthy diet, getting enough sleep and avoiding smoking.

Related stories

• 'Aging clocks' tell you how much 'older' you are than your chronological age. How do they work?
• New 'biological aging' test predicts your odds of dying within the next 12 months
• Sped-up 'biological aging' linked to worse memory

Epigenetic clocks can also help test new drug therapies aimed at slowing down specific aging processes. For example, researchers have shown that rapamycin, a drug connected to various aging processes, can reduce the epigenetic age of human skin cells. There is also some evidence that a treatment designed to regenerate the thymus may slow or even reverse epigenetic aging after one year of treatment. However, researchers have seen these effects only when looking at groups rather than individuals.

Epigenetic clocks are helping scientists advance scientific research on the aging processes, but they aren't medical tests to measure individual health. In the future, epigenetic measurements may play a useful role in guiding personal health decisions. But for now, epigenetic clocks sold as biological age tests are best used and refined by researchers who are studying populations rather than individual people.

This edited article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Idan ShalevAssociate Professor of Biobehavioral Health

Idan Shalev is an associate professor of behavioral health at Penn State

View More

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.

Logout Read more Genetics 'We can identify these really early, before the clinical diagnosis': Epigenetic markers may help explain why Native Hawaiians are aging faster Aging Brain aging results from a loss of control over how genes are regulated, mouse study suggests    SPONSORED_LABEL SPONSORED_HEADLINE SPONSORED_DISCLAIMER SPONSORED_STRAPLINE Aging Could gut microbes hold the secret to aging well? A researcher unpacks the emerging science Aging Loneliness may contribute to memory issues, but not dementia — they are 'not the same thing'    SPONSORED_LABEL SPONSORED_HEADLINE SPONSORED_DISCLAIMER SPONSORED_STRAPLINE Latest in Aging Aging Loneliness may contribute to memory issues, but not dementia — they are 'not the same thing' Aging Brain aging results from a loss of control over how genes are regulated, mouse study suggests    SPONSORED_LABEL SPONSORED_HEADLINE SPONSORED_DISCLAIMER SPONSORED_STRAPLINE Aging 'The limits of human longevity have still not been reached,' study suggests Aging Could gut microbes hold the secret to aging well? A researcher unpacks the emerging science    SPONSORED_LABEL SPONSORED_HEADLINE SPONSORED_DISCLAIMER SPONSORED_STRAPLINE