Scientists claimed the world's oldest rock art is 67,800 years old. But is the science behind that estimate flawed?

1. Archaeology

Scientists claimed the world's oldest rock art is 67,800 years old. But is the science behind that estimate flawed?

A technique that has rewritten the timeline of prehistoric art may be overestimating the ages of cave paintings, some scientists say.

By Sandee Oster published 22 May 2026 in News MEMBER EXCLUSIVE

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

A powerful method for dating prehistoric cave and rock art may be systematically overestimating how old they are, one scientist argues. (Image credit: David Madison via Getty Images)

• Copy link
• Facebook
• X
• Reddit
• Pinterest
• Flipboard

Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter

In recent years, researchers across the world have been publishing increasingly older ages for prehistoric rock art. Among the headliners is a painting of a warty pig in Indonesia that reportedly dates to 51,000 years ago and a hand stencil that researchers claimed was an eye-popping 67,800 years old.

Most of these dates have been determined by measuring the radioactive decay of some versions, or isotopes, of uranium into thorium ‪—‬ a method called uranium-thorium (U-Th) dating. However, the validity of some of these dates has been called into question, with Georges Sauvet, a researcher at the Center for Research and Studies of Prehistoric Art in France, proposing that the method tends to overestimate the ages of dated samples.

In a short communication published March 23 in the journal AOJ of Histoarchaeology and Anthropological Exploration, Sauvet criticized the published dates for some prehistoric rock art, stating that researchers are being less cautious in a "race towards the earliest rock art."

You may like

• Mysterious green rocks in Pyrenees cave hint that prehistoric people were working copper there for 4,000 years
• 'Speculation' and 'egregious failure': 30 researchers publish scathing critiques of study that questioned date of early human occupation of Monte Verde in Chile
• Monte Verde, one of the earliest Indigenous sites in South America, is much younger than thought, study claims. But others call it 'egregiously poor geological work.'

If these dates go unchallenged, Sauvet argued, it distorts our understanding of the intelligence of early Homo sapiens and human relatives, such as Neanderthals.

Sauvet thinks it is absolutely necessary to cross-date with other dating methods to ensure accuracy of the U-Th dating which on its own "is not acceptable," Sauvet said.

What is uranium-thorium dating?

When water washes over and breaks down limestone and then drips into caves, it slowly deposits calcite. As the calcite forms, it traps small amounts of uranium that is also dissolved in the water. The uranium then radioactively decays into several "daughter" isotopes, including thorium isotopes.

The method in question, U-Th dating, involves uranium-234, which contains 92 protons and 142 neutrons and will spit out two protons and two neutrons (called an alpha particle) to form thorium-230, which has 90 protons and 140 neutrons. It takes about 245,629 years for half of a given amount of uranium-234 to decay into thorium-230. So, assuming nothing is added to or taken away from the system since the uranium was deposited, the ratio of these two isotopes can determine the age of a calcite layer deposit.

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

A dated rock art panel at La Pasiega C inSpain that shows a discrepancy between uranium-thorium dates on the left and right sides of the same rectangle, as reported by Hoffmann and colleagues.

(Image credit: Adapted in White et al. 2018)

In theory, this type of U-Th dating can be an incredibly powerful tool for archaeologists.

That's because in some cases, rock art contains carbon, an organic element that can be dated. But often, rock art is made from the mineral ocher or from etchings in stone, neither of which can be radiocarbon-dated.

This is where U-Th dating comes in handy. Calcite can grow over the art, creating a minimum age for its creation.

What to read next

• Paleolithic humans invented an 'early predecessor to writing' at least 40,000 years ago, carved signs suggest
• Tasmanian tigers discovered in Indigenous rock art in Australia, suggesting these marsupials lived there much longer than thought
• Homo erectus' tools include stunning geodes and fossils, possibly as a way to connect with the cosmos, study finds

Questioning the age of rock art

However, in his paper, Sauvet argued that U-Th dating may provide unreliable dates and that all of them need to be cross-checked with other methods before a date can be estimated.

"My first alarm against the danger of the method was reading" a 2018 paper by Dirk Hoffmann, a researcher in the Department of Human Evolution at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, and colleagues, "in which they announce that three Spanish cave [drawings] were dated to 65,000 years and were due to Neanderthals," Sauvet told Live Science in an email. The drawings show red ocher dots, a ladder and hand stencils, and some researchers suggested they show Neanderthals' ability to think artistically.

In a response in 2020, Sauvet and 42 other researchers published a reply highlighting the drawbacks of U-Th dating. The problem, Sauvet said, is that the method relies on calcite deposits forming and remaining in a "closed system," meaning no uranium is leached from the calcite deposit from the time of its formation. In an "open system," rainwater and groundwater percolate through the calcite and leach out uranium, skewing the U-Th ratio and making the deposit appear artificially older than it is.

"Dating of rock art is a particularly challenging subject," Adelphine Bonneau, an assistant professor in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Sherbrooke in Quebec, told Live Science in an email. "In theory, Mr. [Dr.] Sauvet is right. U-series dating [which includes U-Th dating] can lead to overestimated dates."

According to Sauvet's paper, the hunt for increasingly older dates is in part due to grant awards and the prestige that comes with them. This has resulted in a series of increasingly older dates, including the supposedly 65,000-year-old art in Spain.

This date would "imply that paintings were made by Neanderthals, whereas there is absolutely no archaeological proof" that Neanderthals were capable of artistic creation, Sauvet said. (Other researchers, however, disagree, and think Neanderthals did create art.)

Photograph of the Liang Metanduno rock art in Sulawesi and a digital tracing showing the location of dating samples LMET1 and LMET2.

(Image credit: Oktaviana et al. 2026)

The debate was revived with the discovery of negative hand stencils in Sulawesi, Indonesia, that were U-Th-dated to around 67,800 years ago, which recently surpassed all previous records.

To highlight U-Th dating's unreliability, Sauvet cited several cases in his new paper in which U-Th and radiocarbon dates did not match when cross-checked. At Nerja Cave in southern Spain, a U-Th date yielded an age of 119,000 years, while a radiocarbon date of a charcoal mark that was part of the same drawing was around 19,000 years old; meanwhile, another radiocarbon date of a calcite layer from the same art was around 14,000 years old.

At Leang Balangajia, the outer calcite layer, which should be the youngest, was dated to 37,300 years old — roughly 7,800 years older than the layer underneath. In all of these cases, the suggestion is that the calcite layers were open systems.

In defense of U-Th dating

Not all researchers agree with Sauvet's assessment. João Zilhão, a research professor at the University of Lisbon and co-author of the Spanish rock art studies, said any dating method can be susceptible to errors. In an email to Live Science, he drew parallels to radiocarbon dating, in which the ratio of carbon-14 to carbon-12 is measured ‪—‬ a method that can be subject to contamination.

Similarly, optically stimulated luminescence, which measures when something was last exposed to light, can give an artificially old age if someone doesn't account for residual emissions from mineral grains in a sample, he noted.

Liang Metanduno rock art in Sulawesi showing the location of the three samples dated by the uranium-thorium method.

(Image credit: Sauvet 2026)

There will always be ways that dating estimates can be subject to error, and U-Th is not particularly special in that regard, experts told Live Science.

"Saying that uranium-series dating does not work for rock art because there are cases where some calcite samples show open-system behavior is an overgeneralization," said Maxime Aubert, an archaeologist and geochemist at Griffith University in Australia, whose team was behind the Sulawesi dates.

Aubert acknowledged that uranium can leach out of or into calcite deposits, thereby distorting their true age. To get around this problem, his team has in recent years developed a laser ablation approach that allows zones altered by outside water seepage "to be identified and excluded from age calculation," he told Live Science.

To ensure their dates were accurate, including ones for the oldest hand stencil art in the world, Aubert's team used lasers to remove small sections within each sample. Next, they measured the isotope ratios in several of these sections to create a map of the isotope ratios across each calcite layer. Finally, they excluded layers where the isotope ratios varied a lot, which would have suggested contamination.

Scientists have developed other ways to ensure their dates are reliable, Bonneau added. "There are several ways to deal with these open-systems and correct the dates accordingly … Using laser-ablation and having a map of the calcite layers makes it possible to select the most reliable parts and then extract the dates," she said.

Related stories

• Ancient rock art depicting hunters and geometric shapes discovered in Egypt's Sinai Desert — and it spans a period of 10,000 years
• Ancient rock art along US-Mexico border persisted for more than 4,000 years — and it depicts Indigenous views of the universe
• Life-size rock art points the way to oldest human inhabitants of Saudi Arabia — and the desert oases they used

Bonneau noted that Hoffmann and colleagues did not have access to laser ablation at the time of their study, as the technology was still being developed.

To get around this, in past work Aubert "always published a lot of information regarding the different isotope ratios, the composition of the calcite layers, etc.," Bonneau said. "These data are needed to evaluate the reliability of the dates." Hoffmann's study is missing that data, she added, "so we cannot evaluate the reliability of the dates."

While U-Th dating can be subject to error, that doesn't make their age estimates worthless, she said. "Sauvet is right in principle, but if scientists do their job correctly, the dates are reliable," Bonneau concluded.

Article Sources

Sauvet, G. (2026). Uranium-thorium dating: the race towards the earliest rock art. AOJ Hist Archaeol Anthropol Explor, 2(1), 13-15 https://aplombpublications.net/article/uranium-thorium-dating-the-race-towards-the-earliest-rock-art/

How much do you know about our closest relatives? Find out with our neanderthal quiz!

TOPICS news analyses Sandee OsterSocial Links NavigationLive Science Contributor

Sandee Oster is a freelance journalist and Ph.D. candidate based in South Africa. Her beats include archaeology, history and paleontology. Her work has appeared on Phys.org, the Southern African Archaeology Student Society, and she has a popular Medium blog. Her Ph.D. in archaeology is being completed at the University of the Witwatersrand and is focused on developing her zooarchaeological skills, while her master's degree dealt with archaeological rock art.

View More

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.

Logout Read more Archaeology Mysterious green rocks in Pyrenees cave hint that prehistoric people were working copper there for 4,000 years The Americas 'Speculation' and 'egregious failure': 30 researchers publish scathing critiques of study that questioned date of early human occupation of Monte Verde in Chile    SPONSORED_LABEL SPONSORED_HEADLINE SPONSORED_DISCLAIMER SPONSORED_STRAPLINE The Americas Monte Verde, one of the earliest Indigenous sites in South America, is much younger than thought, study claims. But others call it 'egregiously poor geological work.' Archaeology Paleolithic humans invented an 'early predecessor to writing' at least 40,000 years ago, carved signs suggest    SPONSORED_LABEL SPONSORED_HEADLINE SPONSORED_DISCLAIMER SPONSORED_STRAPLINE Latest in Archaeology Archaeology 800-year-old 'hugging skeletons' are genetically confirmed as Poland's only medieval same-sex double burial Archaeology Scurvy-plagued whalers' remains discovered at 'Corpse Point' in Svalbard    SPONSORED_LABEL SPONSORED_HEADLINE SPONSORED_DISCLAIMER SPONSORED_STRAPLINE Ancient Egyptians Great Pyramid of Giza is remarkably resilient to earthquakes —‬ and it's due to the ancient Egyptians' 'extraordinary' engineering knowledge Archaeology 800-year-old notebook and fancy silk toilet paper discovered in medieval latrine in Germany    SPONSORED_LABEL SPONSORED_HEADLINE SPONSORED_DISCLAIMER SPONSORED_STRAPLINE